From: Michal Wajdeczko <[email protected]>

HWS placement restrictions can't just rely on HAS_LLC flag.

Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
index 80fd072ac719..f6799ef9915a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
@@ -513,7 +513,8 @@ static int pin_ggtt_status_page(struct intel_engine_cs 
*engine,
        unsigned int flags;
 
        flags = PIN_GLOBAL;
-       if (!HAS_LLC(engine->i915))
+       if (!HAS_LLC(engine->i915) &&
+           i915_ggtt_has_aperture(&engine->i915->ggtt))
                /*
                 * On g33, we cannot place HWS above 256MiB, so
                 * restrict its pinning to the low mappable arena.
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to