Verify that the values we store in our nonpriv context image registers are restored after a switch.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Cc: Michał Winiarski <[email protected]> --- tests/i915/gem_ctx_isolation.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_isolation.c b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_isolation.c index c4302394e..5be32d60c 100644 --- a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_isolation.c +++ b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_isolation.c @@ -579,6 +579,17 @@ static void nonpriv(int fd, __func__, v, values[v]); write_regs(fd, ctx, e, flags, values[v]); + if (flags & DIRTY2) { + uint32_t sw = gem_context_create(fd); + + igt_spin_free(fd, + igt_spin_new(fd, + .ctx = sw, + .engine = engine)); + + gem_context_destroy(fd, sw); + } + regs[1] = read_regs(fd, ctx, e, flags); /* @@ -838,6 +849,8 @@ igt_main igt_subtest_f("%s-nonpriv", e->name) nonpriv(fd, e, 0); + igt_subtest_f("%s-nonpriv-switch", e->name) + nonpriv(fd, e, DIRTY2); igt_subtest_f("%s-clean", e->name) isolation(fd, e, 0); -- 2.23.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
