On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 01:53:37PM +0530, Anshuman Gupta wrote:
> Add dc3co helper functions to enable/disable psr2 deep sleep.
> Adhere B.Specs by disallow DC3CO state before PSR2 exit.
> Enable PSR2 exitline event and program the desired scanlines
> to exit DC3CO in intel_psr_enable function at modeset path.
> Disable the DC3CO exitline in order to maintian consistent
> pipe config state in encoder disable path.
> 
> v1: Moved calling of tgl_enable_psr2_transcoder_exitline() to
>     intel_psr_enable(). [Imre]
> 
> Cc: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
> Cc: Imre Deak <[email protected]>
> Cc: Animesh Manna <[email protected]>
> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <[email protected]>

You missed some of the review comments for v7, see below.

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h |  2 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h          |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 54 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> index b3c7eef53bf3..11d37f96ce71 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> @@ -534,6 +534,48 @@ transcoder_has_psr2(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, 
> enum transcoder trans)
>               return trans == TRANSCODER_EDP;
>  }
>  
> +static void psr2_program_idle_frames(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> +                                  u32 idle_frames)
> +{
> +     u32 val;
> +
> +     idle_frames <<=  EDP_PSR2_IDLE_FRAME_SHIFT;
> +     val = I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_CTL(dev_priv->psr.transcoder));
> +     val &= ~EDP_PSR2_IDLE_FRAME_MASK;
> +     val |= idle_frames;
> +     I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR2_CTL(dev_priv->psr.transcoder), val);
> +}
> +
> +void tgl_psr2_deep_sleep_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> +     int idle_frames = 0;

No need for a variable for that.

> +
> +     psr2_program_idle_frames(dev_priv, idle_frames);
> +}
> +
> +void tgl_psr2_deep_sleep_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> +     int idle_frames;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Let's use 6 as the minimum to cover all known cases including the
> +      * off-by-one issue that HW has in some cases.
> +      */
> +     idle_frames = max(6, dev_priv->vbt.psr.idle_frames);
> +     idle_frames = max(idle_frames, dev_priv->psr.sink_sync_latency + 1);
> +     psr2_program_idle_frames(dev_priv, idle_frames);
> +}
> +
> +static void tgl_disallow_dc3co_on_psr2_exit(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv)
> +{
> +     if (!IS_TIGERLAKE(dev_priv))
> +             return;

Could we use crtc_state->dc3co_exitline instead (which we would set only
whenever we want to enable DC3co)?

> +
> +     cancel_delayed_work(&dev_priv->csr.idle_work);
> +     /* Before PSR2 exit disallow dc3co*/
> +     tgl_set_target_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC6);
> +}
> +
>  static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>                                   struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  {
> @@ -799,6 +841,10 @@ void intel_psr_enable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  
>       WARN_ON(dev_priv->drrs.dp);
>  
> +     /* Enable PSR2 transcoder exit line */
> +     if (crtc_state->has_psr2)
> +             tgl_enable_psr2_transcoder_exitline(crtc_state);

This is too late to program the EXITLINE reg, since the transcoder is
already enabled.

> +
>       mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
>  
>       if (!psr_global_enabled(dev_priv->psr.debug)) {
> @@ -829,6 +875,7 @@ static void intel_psr_exit(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv)
>       }
>  
>       if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) {
> +             tgl_disallow_dc3co_on_psr2_exit(dev_priv);

So DC5/6 will be reenabled, but I can't see how PSR deep sleep gets
reenabled. I think we should have a function that we call both from here
and the idle thread that reenables DC5/6 and also PSR deep sleep.

>               val = I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_CTL(dev_priv->psr.transcoder));
>               WARN_ON(!(val & EDP_PSR2_ENABLE));
>               val &= ~EDP_PSR2_ENABLE;
> @@ -895,6 +942,10 @@ void intel_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>       if (WARN_ON(!CAN_PSR(dev_priv)))
>               return;
>  
> +     /* Disable PSR2 transcoder exit line */
> +     if (old_crtc_state->has_psr2)
> +             tgl_disable_psr2_transcoder_exitline(old_crtc_state);

The transcoder is still active here so we can't program the EXITLINE reg
at this point.

Please add tgl_enable/disable_psr2_transcoder_exitline() in this patch
where the functions are actually used, the review is difficult when I
have to jump between the two patches.

OTOH tgl_psr2_deep_sleep_enable/disable() is used in a follow-up patch,
but you define them already here; those should be also moved where they
are used for easier review.

> +
>       mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
>  
>       intel_psr_disable_locked(intel_dp);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h
> index 46e4de8b8cd5..75a9862f36fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h
> @@ -35,5 +35,7 @@ void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  int intel_psr_wait_for_idle(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state,
>                           u32 *out_value);
>  bool intel_psr_enabled(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> +void tgl_psr2_deep_sleep_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> +void tgl_psr2_deep_sleep_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>  
>  #endif /* __INTEL_PSR_H__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 68fb732c24c8..4521b9381db3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -494,6 +494,7 @@ struct i915_psr {
>       bool link_standby;
>       bool colorimetry_support;
>       bool psr2_enabled;
> +     bool psr2_deep_slp_disabled;
>       u8 sink_sync_latency;
>       ktime_t last_entry_attempt;
>       ktime_t last_exit;
> -- 
> 2.21.0
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to