Quoting Patchwork (2019-08-06 21:14:15)
> #### Possible regressions ####
> 
>   * igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-10ms:
>     - shard-snb:          [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2] +2 similar issues
>    [1]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6639/shard-snb6/igt@[email protected]
>    [2]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13884/shard-snb1/igt@[email protected]

Broke something in the legacy submission code, probably fiddling with
the ring/timeline.

>   * igt@i915_selftest@mock_requests:
>     - shard-snb:          [PASS][9] -> [DMESG-WARN][10]
>    [9]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6639/shard-snb4/igt@i915_selftest@mock_requests.html
>    [10]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13884/shard-snb7/igt@i915_selftest@mock_requests.html

And a use-after-free in the mock, probably also the ring/timeline fiddling.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to