On Sat, 13 Jul 2019 19:06:40 +0200, Chris Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:

Quoting Daniele Ceraolo Spurio (2019-07-13 17:51:02)


On 7/13/2019 3:19 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-07-13 11:00:08)
>> From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <[email protected]>
>>
>> Instead of always checking in the device config is GuC and HuC are
>> supported or not, we can save the state in the uc_fw structure and
>> avoid going through i915 every time from the low-level uc management
>> code. while at it FIRMWARE_NONE has been renamed to better indicate that >> we haven't started the fetch/load yet, but we might have already selected
>> a blob.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <[email protected]>
> Ok, but I'm not quite getting the feeling of a nice flow through a state
> machine.
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
> -Chris

We had discussed a couple of possible different approaches with Michal
on the other thread, including a better state machine that unifies the
fetch/load cases, I just didn't have time to try them yet. Since the
series is fully reviewed, if you want to get it in while it still
applies I will follow up with that rework on top.

Aye, more than happy with incremental improvements :)

Good to know, as few other improvements are waiting ;)

Michal
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to