On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 04:01:35PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > We've mostly switched over to the new more flexible schema, but > there's one check left in the modeset code. > > Motivated by a question from Ville whether there's really no way an > unsupported pixel_format can escape into our platform update_plane > callbacks. > > v2: Ville noticed that the fb->depth check is redudant when we already > check fb->pixel_format. > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > index 84bd8d3..3f3a3dc 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > @@ -7954,10 +7954,8 @@ intel_set_config_compute_mode_changes(struct > drm_mode_set *set, > config->mode_changed = true; > } else if (set->fb == NULL) { > config->mode_changed = true; > - } else if (set->fb->depth != set->crtc->fb->depth) { > - config->mode_changed = true; > - } else if (set->fb->bits_per_pixel != > - set->crtc->fb->bits_per_pixel) { > + } else if (set->fb->pixel_format != > + set->crtc->fb->pixel_format) { > config->mode_changed = true; > } else > config->fb_changed = true; > -- > 1.7.10.4 -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
