Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-06-13 14:35:13) > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]> > > We have long been slighlty annoyed by the anonymous i915->gt. > > Promote it to a separate structure and give it its own header. > > This is a first step towards cleaning up the separation between i915 and gt. > > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
- [Intel-gfx] [RFC v3 00/28] Implicit dev_priv removal and GT... Tvrtko Ursulin
- [Intel-gfx] [RFC 01/28] drm/i915: Convert intel_vgt_(d... Tvrtko Ursulin
- [Intel-gfx] [RFC 02/28] drm/i915: Introduce struct int... Tvrtko Ursulin
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 02/28] drm/i915: Introduce st... Chris Wilson
- [Intel-gfx] [RFC 04/28] drm/i915: Store some backpoint... Tvrtko Ursulin
- [Intel-gfx] [RFC 07/28] drm/i915: Convert init_unused_... Tvrtko Ursulin
- [Intel-gfx] [RFC 05/28] drm/i915: Make i915_check_and_... Tvrtko Ursulin
- [Intel-gfx] [RFC 03/28] drm/i915: Move intel_gt initia... Tvrtko Ursulin
- [Intel-gfx] [RFC 06/28] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_ini... Tvrtko Ursulin
