On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 09:30:05AM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> 2013/3/22 Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>:
> > This reverts commit cc464b2a17c59adedbdc02cc54341d630354edc3.
> >
> > The reason is that Takashi Iwai reported a regression bisected to this
> > commit:
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg18788.html
> >
> > His machine has eDP on port D (usual desktop all-in-on setup), which
> > intel_dp.c identifies as an eDP panel, but the hsw ddi code
> > mishandles.
> >
> > But in retrospective I also don't like that this leaks highly platform
> > specific details into common code, and the reason is that the drm
> > vblank layer sucks. So instead I think we should:
> > - move the cpu_transcoder into the dynamic pipe_config tracking (once
> > that's merged).
> > - fix up the drm vblank layer to finally deal with kms crtc objects
> > instead of int pipes.
>
> Looks like we'll never get rid of all the unclaimed register errors...
>
> Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <[email protected]>
Picked up for -fixes, thanks for the review.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
