On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 03:56:17PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > v4 of [1], rebased and very mildly tweaked, with the intention to merge.
before it starts conflicting again :) > I added > Chris' Reviewed-bys despite the rebase. Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]> Do you intend to follow-up with a big sed or coccinelle? and document that we should prefer REG_BIT? > > BR, > Jani. > > > [1] [email protected]">http://mid.mail-archive.com/[email protected] > > > Jani Nikula (3): > drm/i915: introduce REG_BIT() and REG_GENMASK() to define register > contents > drm/i915: deprecate _SHIFT in favor of _MASK passed to accessors > drm/i915: use REG_FIELD_PREP() to define register bitfield values > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 182 +++++++++++++++++++----------- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 42 +++---- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c | 42 ++++--- > 3 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 116 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.20.1 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
