Use of the new DRM_COLOR_LUT_NON_DECREASING test was a bit over-zealous;
it doesn't actually need to be applied to the degamma on "bdw-style"
platforms.  Likewise, we overlooked the fact that CHV should have that
test applied to the gamma LUT as well as the degamma LUT.

Rather than adding more complicated platform checking to
intel_color_check(), let's just store the appropriate set of LUT
validation flags for each platform in the intel_device_info structure.

Fixes: 85e2d61e4976 ("drm/i915: Validate userspace-provided color management 
LUT's (v4)")
References: 
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2019-January/187634.html
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c          | 10 ++++++++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c       | 19 +++++--------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
index 44c23ac60347..17f5a605b0b3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
@@ -69,9 +69,15 @@
 #define BDW_COLORS \
        .color = { .degamma_lut_size = 512, .gamma_lut_size = 512 }
 #define CHV_COLORS \
-       .color = { .degamma_lut_size = 65, .gamma_lut_size = 257 }
+       .color = { .degamma_lut_size = 65, .gamma_lut_size = 257, \
+                  .degamma_lut_tests = DRM_COLOR_LUT_NON_DECREASING, \
+                  .gamma_lut_tests = DRM_COLOR_LUT_NON_DECREASING, \
+       }
 #define GLK_COLORS \
-       .color = { .degamma_lut_size = 0, .gamma_lut_size = 1024 }
+       .color = { .degamma_lut_size = 0, .gamma_lut_size = 1024, \
+                  .degamma_lut_tests = DRM_COLOR_LUT_NON_DECREASING | \
+                                       DRM_COLOR_LUT_EQUAL_CHANNELS, \
+       }
 
 /* Keep in gen based order, and chronological order within a gen */
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
index bc7589656a8f..cd08f58b1e47 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
@@ -609,24 +609,15 @@ int intel_color_check(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
 {
        struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc_state->base.crtc->dev);
        size_t gamma_length, degamma_length;
-       uint32_t tests = DRM_COLOR_LUT_NON_DECREASING;
+       u32 gamma_tests, degamma_tests;
 
        degamma_length = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->color.degamma_lut_size;
        gamma_length = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->color.gamma_lut_size;
+       degamma_tests = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->color.degamma_lut_tests;
+       gamma_tests = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->color.gamma_lut_tests;
 
-       /*
-        * All of our platforms mandate that the degamma curve be
-        * non-decreasing.  Additionally, GLK and gen11 only accept a single
-        * value for red, green, and blue in the degamma table.  Make sure
-        * userspace didn't try to pass us something we can't handle.
-        *
-        * We don't have any extra hardware constraints on the gamma table,
-        * so no need to explicitly check it.
-        */
-       if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
-               tests |= DRM_COLOR_LUT_EQUAL_CHANNELS;
-
-       if (drm_color_lut_check(crtc_state->base.degamma_lut, tests) != 0)
+       if (drm_color_lut_check(crtc_state->base.degamma_lut, degamma_tests) ||
+           drm_color_lut_check(crtc_state->base.gamma_lut, gamma_tests))
                return -EINVAL;
 
        /*
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
index 957c6527f76b..7bf09cef591a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
@@ -189,6 +189,8 @@ struct intel_device_info {
        struct color_luts {
                u16 degamma_lut_size;
                u16 gamma_lut_size;
+               u32 degamma_lut_tests;
+               u32 gamma_lut_tests;
        } color;
 };
 
-- 
2.14.5

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to