We may not concurrently change the power wells code. Which
is already guaranteed since modesets aren't concurrent. That
leaves races against setup/teardown/suspend/resume, and for
those we already (try) rather hard not to hit concurrent
modesets.

No debug WARN_ON added since that would require us to grab the
modeset locks in init/suspend code. Which is again just cargo
culting since just grabbing the locks in those paths isn't good
enough, we need the right order of operations, too.

Cc: Paulo Zanoni <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c |    4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 703219c..f024e7d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -4091,8 +4091,6 @@ void intel_init_power_well(struct drm_device *dev)
        if (!IS_HASWELL(dev))
                return;
 
-       mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
-
        /* For now, we need the power well to be always enabled. */
        intel_set_power_well(dev, true);
 
@@ -4100,8 +4098,6 @@ void intel_init_power_well(struct drm_device *dev)
         * the driver is in charge now. */
        if (I915_READ(HSW_PWR_WELL_BIOS) & HSW_PWR_WELL_ENABLE)
                I915_WRITE(HSW_PWR_WELL_BIOS, 0);
-
-       mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 }
 
 /* Set up chip specific power management-related functions */
-- 
1.7.10.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to