> -----Original Message----- > From: Kulkarni, Vandita > Sent: Monday, November 5, 2018 11:17 AM > To: Nikula, Jani <[email protected]>; Chauhan, Madhav > <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v10 00/15] drm/i915/icl: dsi enabling > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Nikula, Jani > > Sent: Sunday, November 4, 2018 12:46 AM > > To: Chauhan, Madhav <[email protected]>; intel- > > [email protected]; Kulkarni, Vandita > > <[email protected]> > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v10 00/15] drm/i915/icl: dsi enabling > > > > On Sat, 03 Nov 2018, Madhav Chauhan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On 11/2/2018 7:15 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: > > >> On Fri, 02 Nov 2018, Jani Nikula <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> Next version of [1]. Sorry for the spam, needed to get the > > >>> authorship straight. Fixed power domains and compute config hook > > initialization. > > >> It looks like DDI intel_ddi_get_hw_state() returns true for ICL DSI > Yes, it does, checked on Jani's latest branch. > > >> as well. I'm not sure how this wasn't a problem before, but if I'm > > >> not mistaken it is now. > > >> > > >> At least that's my only explanation to intel_ddi_get_config() > > >> hitting WARN_ON(transcoder_is_dsi(cpu_transcoder)). > > > > > > I didn't observe that while testing. Where can we access the complete > log?? > Sent.
There were some patches from Clock enabling and one hack wrt to VBT parsing. Vandita will be trying with those. Regards, Madhav > -Vandita > > > > Vandita reported that. > > > > BR, > > Jani. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > Madhav > > > > > >> > > >> BR, > > >> Jani. > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > -- > > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
