On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 02:56:52PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> Since when it was introduced we forgot to add
> this case so ICL was using a wrong signal_levels
> as reference.
>
> Fixes: fb5c8e9d4350 ("drm/i915/icl: Implement voltage swing programming
> sequence for Combo PHY DDI")
> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <[email protected]>
> Cc: Manasi Navare <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]>
yep this was missed indeed. The bxt_signal_levels() has a case for IS_ICELAKE()
but
that was never getting called. Thanks for fixing this.
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <[email protected]>
Manasi
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 1f098e509143..3384a9bbdafd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -3790,7 +3790,7 @@ intel_dp_set_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> uint32_t signal_levels, mask = 0;
> uint8_t train_set = intel_dp->train_set[0];
>
> - if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv)) {
> + if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) || INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10) {
> signal_levels = bxt_signal_levels(intel_dp);
> } else if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv)) {
> signal_levels = ddi_signal_levels(intel_dp);
> --
> 2.19.1
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
