Op 11-10-18 om 13:59 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 12:04:54PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> The CRTC is idle at this point, so we can dereference crtc->state safely.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 11 +++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> index 19d7714df021..cbe70bc4d02d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> @@ -15934,6 +15934,7 @@ intel_modeset_setup_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev,
>> {
>> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
>> struct intel_crtc *crtc;
>> + struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> Can be moved into narrower scope.
2 places use it, the power domains and the dump_pipe_config, because of this
I kept it as top scope. :)
Thanks, pushed patch 2-9. Hoping to get a reviewer for 1, and will resubmit
10/10 with
a patch doing the proposed intel_wait_for_vblank_if_active() changes.
>> struct intel_encoder *encoder;
>> int i;
>>
>> @@ -15952,7 +15953,7 @@ intel_modeset_setup_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev,
>> for_each_intel_crtc(&dev_priv->drm, crtc) {
>> drm_crtc_vblank_reset(&crtc->base);
>>
>> - if (crtc->active)
>> + if (crtc->base.state->active)
>> drm_crtc_vblank_on(&crtc->base);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -15961,9 +15962,10 @@ intel_modeset_setup_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev,
>> for_each_intel_encoder(dev, encoder)
>> intel_sanitize_encoder(encoder);
>>
>> - for_each_intel_crtc(&dev_priv->drm, crtc) {
>> + for_each_intel_crtc(dev, crtc) {
> I'd keep the dev_priv->drm, because we should just change the function
> to take the dev_priv directly.
>
> Apart from those
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
