Regards

Shashank


On 10/15/2018 4:39 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, Jani Nikula <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, 05 Oct 2018, [email protected] wrote:
From: Clint Taylor <[email protected]>

HDMI Forum VSDB YCBCR420 deep color capability bits are 2:0. Correct
definitions in the header for the mask to work correctly.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107893
Signed-off-by: Clint Taylor <[email protected]>
When posting fixes like this, please do git blame on the stuff you're
fixing, and add Fixes: tag and a bunch of Cc's. It'll help us propagate
the fix to stable kernels and get feedback from the authors and
reviewers. 'dim fixes' will help you with this:

$ dim fixes e6a9a2c3dc437
Fixes: e6a9a2c3dc43 ("drm/edid: parse ycbcr 420 deep color information")
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
Cc: Jose Abreu <[email protected]>
Cc: Shashank Sharma <[email protected]>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <[email protected]>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]>
Cc: Sean Paul <[email protected]>
Cc: David Airlie <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: <[email protected]> # v4.14+

Anyway this looks sane to me,

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>

but I'm wondering if there was some deeper meaning to the original |= in
there.
Honestly, I was considering new blocks in HDMI 2.1 spec for dc, and parsing of those before this block, keeping |= required. But we can always do other way around, or will take care of it when we add code for it.
Just cross checked with the spec too,

Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma <[email protected]>

- Shashank

PS. It'll be useful to repost this Cc: intel-gfx just to get the CI as
we seem to be the only consumer of the stuff being fixed.


BR,
Jani.


---
  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 2 +-
  include/drm/drm_edid.h     | 6 +++---
  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
index 1e2b940..ff0bfc6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
@@ -4282,7 +4282,7 @@ static void drm_parse_ycbcr420_deep_color_info(struct 
drm_connector *connector,
        struct drm_hdmi_info *hdmi = &connector->display_info.hdmi;
dc_mask = db[7] & DRM_EDID_YCBCR420_DC_MASK;
-       hdmi->y420_dc_modes |= dc_mask;
+       hdmi->y420_dc_modes = dc_mask;
  }
static void drm_parse_hdmi_forum_vsdb(struct drm_connector *connector,
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_edid.h b/include/drm/drm_edid.h
index b25d12e..e3c4048 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_edid.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_edid.h
@@ -214,9 +214,9 @@ struct detailed_timing {
  #define DRM_EDID_HDMI_DC_Y444             (1 << 3)
/* YCBCR 420 deep color modes */
-#define DRM_EDID_YCBCR420_DC_48                  (1 << 6)
-#define DRM_EDID_YCBCR420_DC_36                  (1 << 5)
-#define DRM_EDID_YCBCR420_DC_30                  (1 << 4)
+#define DRM_EDID_YCBCR420_DC_48                  (1 << 2)
+#define DRM_EDID_YCBCR420_DC_36                  (1 << 1)
+#define DRM_EDID_YCBCR420_DC_30                  (1 << 0)
  #define DRM_EDID_YCBCR420_DC_MASK (DRM_EDID_YCBCR420_DC_48 | \
                                    DRM_EDID_YCBCR420_DC_36 | \
                                    DRM_EDID_YCBCR420_DC_30)

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to