Op 11-10-18 om 13:56 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 12:04:51PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> has_drrs is a flag we can't read out. We set it when seamless DRRS is
>> enabled in pipe_config, so intel_dump_pipe_config() and
>> intel_pipe_config_compare() will continue to do the right thing when
>> has_drrs is set on the real state.
>>
>> This removes one more dereference of crtc->config.
>> While at it, fixup the comment and also read out M2_N2 for CHV, since
>> we program it in the set_m_n function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 11 +++++------
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> index bb16a9acf117..7812fab31646 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> @@ -6893,8 +6893,8 @@ static void intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m_n(const struct 
>> intel_crtc_state *crtc_sta
>>              I915_WRITE(PIPE_LINK_M1(transcoder), m_n->link_m);
>>              I915_WRITE(PIPE_LINK_N1(transcoder), m_n->link_n);
>>              /* M2_N2 registers to be set only for gen < 8 (M2_N2 available
>> -             * for gen < 8) and if DRRS is supported (to make sure the
>> -             * registers are not unnecessarily accessed).
>> +             * for gen < 8 and CHV) and if DRRS is supported (to make sure
>> +             * the registers are not unnecessarily accessed).
>>               */
>>              if (m2_n2 && (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv) ||
>>                  INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 8) && crtc_state->has_drrs) {
> I think what I'd really like to see is splitting the m/n and m2/n2 stuff
> into two distinct pieces, and when we don't use drrs we could just
> set m2_n2 = m_n, and program the everything exactly the same way as
> when drrs is enabled.
>
> Also we could nuke that "m/n vs. m2/n2" enum and just pass the correct
> struct to foo_set_m_n() directly.
>
>> @@ -8747,11 +8747,10 @@ static void intel_cpu_transcoder_get_m_n(struct 
>> intel_crtc *crtc,
>>              m_n->tu = ((I915_READ(PIPE_DATA_M1(transcoder))
>>                          & TU_SIZE_MASK) >> TU_SIZE_SHIFT) + 1;
>>              /* Read M2_N2 registers only for gen < 8 (M2_N2 available for
>> -             * gen < 8) and if DRRS is supported (to make sure the
>> -             * registers are not unnecessarily read).
>> +             * gen < 8 and CHV).
>>               */
>> -            if (m2_n2 && INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 8 &&
>> -                    crtc->config->has_drrs) {
>> +            if (m2_n2 && (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 8 ||
>> +                          IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))) {
> I think this is maybe the third installment of this check. Could
> perhaps use a small has_m2_n2() helper to avoid the repetition?
>
> Either way
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
Hm looks like this is causing a unclaimed register read in debugfs. Could we 
limit reads/writes to eDP trasncoder?
>>                      m2_n2->link_m = I915_READ(PIPE_LINK_M2(transcoder));
>>                      m2_n2->link_n = I915_READ(PIPE_LINK_N2(transcoder));
>>                      m2_n2->gmch_m = I915_READ(PIPE_DATA_M2(transcoder))
>> -- 
>> 2.19.0
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to