On Thursday, September 20, 2018 1:43:20 PM PDT José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> Now both PSR and PSR2 have the same exit mask, so let's share then
> instead of have the same code 2 times.
> 
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 34 ++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c index b6838b525502..358bbcd3b5f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -575,28 +575,20 @@ static void intel_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp, else
>                       chicken &= ~VSC_DATA_SEL_SOFTWARE_CONTROL;
>               I915_WRITE(CHICKEN_TRANS(cpu_transcoder), chicken);
> -
> -             I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_DEBUG,
> -                        EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MEMUP |
> -                        EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_HPD |
> -                        EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_LPSP |
> -                        EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MAX_SLEEP |
> -                        EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_DISP_REG_WRITE);
> -     } else {
> -             /*
> -              * Per Spec: Avoid continuous PSR exit by masking MEMUP
> -              * and HPD. also mask LPSP to avoid dependency on other
> -              * drivers that might block runtime_pm besides
> -              * preventing  other hw tracking issues now we can rely
> -              * on frontbuffer tracking.
> -              */
> -             I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_DEBUG,
> -                        EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MEMUP |
> -                        EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_HPD |
> -                        EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_LPSP |
> -                        EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_DISP_REG_WRITE |
> -                        EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MAX_SLEEP);
>       }
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Per Spec: Avoid continuous PSR exit by masking MEMUP and HPD also
> +      * mask LPSP to avoid dependency on other drivers that might block
> +      * runtime_pm besides preventing  other hw tracking issues now we
> +      * can rely on frontbuffer tracking.
> +      */

Hmm.. I don't think I understand this comment completely and we should update 
it. This patch however looks correct,
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <[email protected]>


> +     I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_DEBUG,
> +                EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MEMUP |
> +                EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_HPD |
> +                EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_LPSP |
> +                EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_DISP_REG_WRITE |
> +                EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MAX_SLEEP);
>  }
> 
>  static void intel_psr_enable_locked(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,




_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to