Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-09-17 16:46:19) > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]> > > Lite restore is sufficiently covered in gem_exec_nop. > > At the same time tidy code in the test a bit to bring it closer to today's > coding style. > > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]> > Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/gem_ctx_bad_exec: Conso... Tvrtko Ursulin
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] gem_ctx_exec: Remove lrc... Tvrtko Ursulin
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] gem_ctx_exec: Re... Chris Wilson
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/gem_... Chris Wilson
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/... Tvrtko Ursulin
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] te... Chris Wilson
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2... Tvrtko Ursulin
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-... Chris Wilson
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH ... Chris Wilson
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PA... Tvrtko Ursulin
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PA... Chris Wilson
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3 1... Tvrtko Ursulin
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t ... Chris Wilson
