On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:33:06AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
> 
> igt_skip_on_simulation is called both directly from tests but also from
> library helpers. In the latter case especially the logged caller name is
> useless since it is always the helper itself. What we instead want to know
> is who is the caller.
> 
> Trivial approach would be to move the helper to a header as static inline,
> but due the longjmp in it it can never be inlined. Alternative option is
> to print a backtrace from it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
> Cc: Radoslaw Szwichtenberg <[email protected]>
> ---
>  lib/igt_core.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/igt_core.c b/lib/igt_core.c
> index 23bb858fd886..990abc5a36b3 100644
> --- a/lib/igt_core.c
> +++ b/lib/igt_core.c
> @@ -2065,14 +2065,26 @@ bool igt_run_in_simulation(void)
>   */
>  void igt_skip_on_simulation(void)
>  {
> +     bool in_simulation;
> +
>       if (igt_only_list_subtests())
>               return;
>  
> +     in_simulation = igt_run_in_simulation();
> +
>       if (!igt_can_fail()) {
> -             igt_fixture
> -                     igt_require(!igt_run_in_simulation());
> -     } else
> -             igt_require(!igt_run_in_simulation());
> +             igt_fixture {
> +                     if (in_simulation) {
> +                             print_backtrace();
> +                             igt_require(!in_simulation);
> +                     }
> +             }
> +     } else {
> +             if (in_simulation) {
> +                     print_backtrace();
> +                     igt_require(!in_simulation);

Hm, why don't we go right ahead and push this into igt_skip()? There's a
pile of other igt_require, and we tend to push a lot of these into the
library. So they have all the same problem.
-Daniel

> +             }
> +     }
>  }
>  
>  /* structured logging */
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> igt-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to