On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 07:41:24PM +0530, Mahesh Kumar wrote:
> Memory with 16GB dimms require an increase of 1us in level-0 latency.
> This patch implements the same.
> Bspec: 4381
>
> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index b93194cbd820..c6d30653d70c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -1063,6 +1063,29 @@ static void intel_sanitize_options(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> intel_gvt_sanitize_options(dev_priv);
> }
>
> +static void
> +intel_memdev_is_16gb_dimm(struct memdev_info *memdev_info,
> + u8 rank, u8 size, u8 width)
> +{
> + bool found_16gb_dimm = false;
> +
> + if (size == 16 && width == SKL_DRAM_WIDTH_X8 &&
> + rank == SKL_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE)
> + found_16gb_dimm = true;
> + else if (size == 32 && width == SKL_DRAM_WIDTH_X8 &&
> + rank == SKL_DRAM_RANK_DUAL)
> + found_16gb_dimm = true;
> + else if (size == 8 && width == SKL_DRAM_WIDTH_X16 &&
> + rank == SKL_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE)
> + found_16gb_dimm = true;
> + else if (size == 16 && width == SKL_DRAM_WIDTH_X16 &&
> + rank == SKL_DRAM_RANK_DUAL)
> + found_16gb_dimm = true;
> +
> + if (!memdev_info->is_16gb_dimm)
> + memdev_info->is_16gb_dimm = found_16gb_dimm;
> +}
Pure functions are generally more fun. Would also make the function name
match the implementation.
> +
> static enum memdev_rank
> skl_memdev_get_channel_rank(struct memdev_info *memdev_info, u32 val)
> {
> @@ -1084,6 +1107,8 @@ skl_memdev_get_channel_rank(struct memdev_info
> *memdev_info, u32 val)
> if (l_size == 0 && s_size == 0)
> return I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID;
>
> + memdev_info->valid_dimm = true;
> +
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("(size:width:rank) L(%dGB:X%d:%s) S(%dGB:X%d:%s)\n",
> l_size, (1 << l_width) * 8, l_rank ? "dual" : "single",
> s_size, (1 << s_width) * 8, s_rank ? "dual" : "single");
> @@ -1096,6 +1121,9 @@ skl_memdev_get_channel_rank(struct memdev_info
> *memdev_info, u32 val)
> else
> rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE;
>
> + intel_memdev_is_16gb_dimm(memdev_info, l_rank, l_size, l_width);
> + intel_memdev_is_16gb_dimm(memdev_info, s_rank, s_size, s_width);
> +
> return rank;
> }
>
> @@ -1247,6 +1275,7 @@ bxt_get_memdev_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + memdev_info->valid_dimm = true;
> memdev_info->valid = true;
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1259,6 +1288,8 @@ intel_get_memdev_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> int ret;
>
> memdev_info->valid = false;
> + memdev_info->valid_dimm = false;
> + memdev_info->is_16gb_dimm = false;
> memdev_info->rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID;
> memdev_info->bandwidth_kbps = 0;
> memdev_info->num_channels = 0;
> @@ -1282,9 +1313,9 @@ intel_get_memdev_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> sprintf(bandwidth_str, "unknown");
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DRAM bandwidth:%s, total-channels: %u\n",
> bandwidth_str, memdev_info->num_channels);
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DRAM rank: %s rank\n",
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DRAM rank: %s rank 16GB-dimm:%s\n",
> (memdev_info->rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_DUAL) ?
> - "dual" : "single");
> + "dual" : "single", yesno(memdev_info->is_16gb_dimm));
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 845447d3806a..244adf8a30f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1914,6 +1914,8 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
>
> struct memdev_info {
> bool valid;
> + bool valid_dimm;
> + bool is_16gb_dimm;
> u8 num_channels;
> enum memdev_rank {
> I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID = 0,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 53aaaa3e6886..f20f2f9118df 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -2874,6 +2874,19 @@ static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> }
> }
>
> + /*
> + * WA Level-0 adjustment for 16GB DIMMs: SKL+
> + * If we could not get dimm info enable this WA to prevent from
> + * any underrun. If not able to get Dimm info assume 16GB dimm
> + * to avoid any underrun.
> + */
> + if (dev_priv->memdev_info.valid_dimm) {
> + if (dev_priv->memdev_info.is_16gb_dimm)
So we only need these two bools in the end? Is there any point in storing
all the intermediate stuff under dev_priv?
> + wm[0] += 1;
> + } else {
> + wm[0] += 1;
> + }
> +
> } else if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv)) {
> uint64_t sskpd = I915_READ64(MCH_SSKPD);
>
> --
> 2.16.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
