We correctly attach the exclusive fetch for the scratch object when
emitting a request that writes into it, but for completeness we should
also declared the write to i915_vma_move_to_active()

Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_context.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_context.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
index c0c26fae45c7..cc848ceeb3c3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static int gpu_fill(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
        i915_vma_unpin(batch);
        i915_vma_close(batch);
 
-       i915_vma_move_to_active(vma, rq, 0);
+       i915_vma_move_to_active(vma, rq, EXEC_OBJECT_WRITE);
        i915_vma_unpin(vma);
 
        reservation_object_lock(obj->resv, NULL);
-- 
2.18.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to