On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 11:18:20AM +0000, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> While debugging we may want to examine params passed to GuC.
>
> v2: drop #ifdef DEBUG_GUC - Michal
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <[email protected]>
> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <[email protected]>
> Cc: Michel Thierry <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <[email protected]> #1
> Cc: Michal Winiarski <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
> index 1aff30b..feecf6e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
> @@ -327,6 +327,9 @@ void intel_guc_init_params(struct intel_guc *guc)
> params[GUC_CTL_DEBUG] = guc_ctl_debug_flags(guc);
> params[GUC_CTL_CTXINFO] = guc_ctl_ctxinfo_flags(guc);
>
> + for (i = 0; i < GUC_CTL_MAX_DWORDS; i++)
> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("param[%2d] = %#x\n", i, params[i]);
> +
Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <[email protected]>
-Michał
> /*
> * All SOFT_SCRATCH registers are in FORCEWAKE_BLITTER domain and
> * they are power context saved so it's ok to release forcewake
> --
> 1.9.1
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
