Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-04-06 10:11:57)
>
> On 30/03/2018 14:18, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > if (!wait_for_hang(&h, prev)) {
>
> This was confusing me a period since I was assuming the seqno check is
> against the breadcrumb, but it is actually about the same number written
> to a different place. So it actually means
> wait_for_request_to_start_executing.
Bonus points for a better name than struct hang.
struct spinner;
spinner_wait_until_active() ?
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
