Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-03-26 12:50:35)
> When cancelling the requests and clearing out the ports following a
> successful preemption completion, also clear the active flag. I had
> assumed that all preemptions would be followed by an immediate dequeue
> (preserving the active user flag), but under rare circumstances we may
> be triggering a preemption for the second port only for it to have
> completed before the preemotion kicks in; leaving execlists->active set
> even though the system is now idle.
>
> We can clear the flag inside the common execlists_cancel_port_requests()
> as the other users also expect the semantics of active being cleared.
>
> Fixes: f6322eddaff7 ("drm/i915/preemption: Allow preemption between
> submission ports")
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
> Cc: Michał Winiarski <[email protected]>
> Cc: Michel Thierry <[email protected]>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <[email protected]>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
From the earlier posting,
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <[email protected]>
Mika, any chance you want to complete the hat check and review the first
patch as well? :)
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
