Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-02-08 14:34:38) > > On 08/02/2018 14:22, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 01:06:05PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > >> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]> > >> > >> Coccinelle transformation: > >> > >> @@ > >> expression p, g; > >> @@ > >> ( > >> -INTEL_GEN(p) > g > >> +IS_GEN_GT(p, g) > > > > I think this stuff makes the code pretty close to illegible. > > In this particular case even more so because "GT" actually > > means something very different to us. > > Oh how true! And I did not realize it at all while writing it! :) > > Anyway, something like this, regardless of a name, is needed if people > want this to be effective. Since the checks have to be moved to known at > compile time. Or a completely different approach will be needed.
IS_GEN_RANGE() doesn't cut it? I think that people find it inconvenient to use, so some sugar is still required. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
