Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-02-07 10:40:46)
> 
> On 06/02/2018 09:46, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > When a request is preempted, it is unsubmitted from the HW queue and
> > removed from the active list of breadcrumbs. In the process, this
> > however triggers the signaler and it may see the clear rbtree with the
> > old, and still valid, seqno. This confuses the signaler into action and
> > signaling the fence.
> > 
> > Fixes: d6a2289d9d6b ("drm/i915: Remove the preempted request from the 
> > execution queue")
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
> > Cc: <[email protected]> # v4.12+
> > ---
> Looks OK. But I can't say it's straightforward to understand it.

But I hope the GEM_BUG_ON() was nice icing on the cake :)
 
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>

Thanks, added your explanation to the changelog and pushed.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to