On Mon, 2018-01-15 at 08:47 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Watching a light workload on Baytrail (running glxgears and a 1080p
> decode), instead of the system remaining at low frequency, the glxgears
> would regularly trigger waitboosting after which it would have to spend
> a few seconds throttling back down. In this case, the waitboosting is
> counter productive as the minimal wait for glxgears doesn't prevent it
> from functioning correctly and delivering frames on time. In this case,
> glxgears happens to almost always be waiting on the current request,
> which we already expect to complete quickly (see i915_spin_request) and
> so avoiding the waitboost on the active request and spinning instead
> provides the best latency without overcommitting to upclocking.
> However, if the system falls behind we still force the waitboost.
> Similarly, we will also trigger upclocking if we detect the system is
> not delivering frames on time - again using a mechanism that tries to
> detect a miss and not preemptively upclock.
> 
> v2: Also skip boosting for after missed vblank if the desired request is
> already active.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
> Cc: Radoslaw Szwichtenberg <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>

Regards, Joonas
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to