On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 06:52:18 +0100, Sagar Arun Kamble <[email protected]> wrote:



On 1/10/2018 9:35 PM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
We used value -1 to indicate "disabled" and values 0..3 to
indicate "enabled", but most of our other modparams are using
-1 for "auto" mode and 0 for "disable". For consistency let's
change our log level values to:

-1: auto (depends on USES_GUC and DRM_I915_DEBUG)
"depends on HAS_GUC, USES_GUC, DRM_I915_DEBUG and DRM_I915_DEBUG_GEM"

I should write "(depends on platform and Kconfig.debug settings)" as
actual condition may change in the near feature.

s/intel_uc_is_using_guc()/USES_GUC
seeing some more intel_uc_is_using_* instead of macro usage USES_*

It was by design, as in intel_uc_sanitize_options() function we are
using only HAS_xxx macros and instead of USES_xxx we call intel_uc_is_xxx
helpers directly.

  0: disabled
  1: enabled (severity level 0 = min)
  2: enabled (severity level 1)
  3: enabled (severity level 2)
  4: enabled (severity level 3 = max)

Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <[email protected]>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <[email protected]>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
Cc: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c   |  3 ++-
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c     | 21 ++++++++++-----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++----------------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
  4 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
index b5f3eb4..0b553a8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
@@ -155,7 +155,8 @@ struct i915_params i915_modparams __read_mostly = {
        "(-1=auto, 0=disable [default], 1=GuC submission, 2=HuC load)");
    i915_param_named(guc_log_level, int, 0400,
-       "GuC firmware logging level (-1:disabled (default), 0-3:enabled)");
+       "GuC firmware logging level. Requires GuC to be loaded. "
+ "(-1=auto [default], 0=disable, 1..4=enable with verbosity min..max)");
    i915_param_named_unsafe(guc_firmware_path, charp, 0400,
        "GuC firmware path to use instead of the default one");
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
index 50b4725..2227236 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
@@ -215,6 +215,18 @@ static u32 get_core_family(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
        }
  }
  +static u32 get_log_verbosity_flags(void)
+{
making this inline would be good i guess.

No need to do so. Compiler will take care of it as needed (as this
function is already marked as static)

+       if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level > 0) {
+               u32 verbosity = i915_modparams.guc_log_level - 1;
+
+               GEM_BUG_ON(verbosity > GUC_LOG_VERBOSITY_MAX);
+               return verbosity << GUC_LOG_VERBOSITY_SHIFT;
+       }
+       GEM_BUG_ON(i915_modparams.enable_guc < 0);
+       return GUC_LOG_DISABLED;
+}
+
  /*
   * Initialise the GuC parameter block before starting the firmware
   * transfer. These parameters are read by the firmware on startup
@@ -247,12 +259,7 @@ void intel_guc_init_params(struct intel_guc *guc)
        params[GUC_CTL_LOG_PARAMS] = guc->log.flags;
  -     if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level >= 0) {
-               params[GUC_CTL_DEBUG] =
-                       i915_modparams.guc_log_level << GUC_LOG_VERBOSITY_SHIFT;
-       } else {
-               params[GUC_CTL_DEBUG] = GUC_LOG_DISABLED;
-       }
+       params[GUC_CTL_DEBUG] = get_log_verbosity_flags();
/* If GuC submission is enabled, set up additional parameters here */
        if (USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(dev_priv)) {
@@ -445,7 +452,7 @@ int intel_guc_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
        if (guc->fw.load_status != INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_SUCCESS)
                return 0;
  -     if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level >= 0)
+       if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level > 0)
if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level)
                gen9_enable_guc_interrupts(dev_priv);
        data[0] = INTEL_GUC_ACTION_EXIT_S_STATE;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
index eaedd63..e6d59bf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
<snip>
@@ -582,7 +578,7 @@ int i915_guc_log_control(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u64 control_val)
                return -EINVAL;
        /* This combination doesn't make sense & won't have any effect */
-       if (!log_param.logging_enabled && (i915_modparams.guc_log_level < 0))
+       if (!log_param.logging_enabled && !i915_modparams.guc_log_level)
                return 0;
        ret = guc_log_control(guc, log_param.value);
@@ -592,11 +588,12 @@ int i915_guc_log_control(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u64 control_val)
        }
        if (log_param.logging_enabled) {
-               i915_modparams.guc_log_level = log_param.verbosity;
+               i915_modparams.guc_log_level = 1 + log_param.verbosity;
reading the log level from i915_guc_log_control_get debugfs should decrement guc_log_level by 1.

That's the other story.
If I read our code right, we were using different format for get:
(0=level 0, 1=level 1, ... 3=level 3)
and set:
(0=disabled, 1=enabled level 0, 9=enabled level 1, 11=enabled level 2...

I think we can change that to use always (0, 1..4) and hide internal
layout of the GuC command from the user.


- /* If log_level was set as -1 at boot time, then the relay channel file - * wouldn't have been created by now and interrupts also would not have
-                * been enabled. Try again now, just in case.
+               /*
+                * If log was disabled at boot time, then the relay channel file
+                * wouldn't have been created by now and interrupts also would
+                * not have been enabled. Try again now, just in case.
                 */
                ret = guc_log_late_setup(guc);
                if (ret < 0) {
@@ -607,7 +604,8 @@ int i915_guc_log_control(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u64 control_val)
                /* GuC logging is currently the only user of Guc2Host 
interrupts */
                gen9_enable_guc_interrupts(dev_priv);
        } else {
-               /* Once logging is disabled, GuC won't generate logs & send an
+               /*
+                * Once logging is disabled, GuC won't generate logs & send an
                 * interrupt. But there could be some data in the log buffer
                 * which is yet to be captured. So request GuC to update the log
                 * buffer state and then collect the left over logs.
@@ -615,7 +613,7 @@ int i915_guc_log_control(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u64 control_val)
                guc_flush_logs(guc);
                /* As logging is disabled, update log level to reflect that */
-               i915_modparams.guc_log_level = -1;
+               i915_modparams.guc_log_level = 0;
        }
        return ret;
@@ -623,8 +621,7 @@ int i915_guc_log_control(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u64 control_val)
    void i915_guc_log_register(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
  {
-       if (!USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(dev_priv) ||
-           (i915_modparams.guc_log_level < 0))
+       if (!USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(dev_priv) || !i915_modparams.guc_log_level)
                return;
        mutex_lock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
index d82ca0f..fd39c06 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
@@ -65,6 +65,21 @@ static int __get_platform_enable_guc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
        return enable_guc;
  }
+static int __get_default_guc_log_level(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+       int guc_log_level = 0; /* disabled */
+
+       /* Enable if we're running on platform with GuC and debug config */
+       if (HAS_GUC(dev_priv) && intel_uc_is_using_guc() &&
+           (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG) ||
+            IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_GEM)))
+               guc_log_level = 1 + GUC_LOG_VERBOSITY_MAX;
+
+       /* Any platform specific fine-tuning can be done here */
+
+       return guc_log_level;
+}
+
  /**
   * intel_uc_sanitize_options - sanitize uC related modparam options
   * @dev_priv: device private
@@ -74,6 +89,13 @@ static int __get_platform_enable_guc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) * modparam varies between platforms and it is hardcoded in driver code. * Any other modparam value is only monitored against availability of the
   * related hardware or firmware definitions.
+ *
+ * In case of "guc_log_level" option this function will attempt to modify + * it only if it was initially set to "auto(-1)" or if initial value was
+ * "enable(1..4)" on platforms without the GuC. Default value for this
+ * modparam varies between platforms and is usually set to "disable(0)"
+ * unless GuC is enabled on given platform and the driver is compiled with
+ * debug config when this modparam will default to "enable(1..4)".
   */
  void intel_uc_sanitize_options(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
  {
@@ -105,8 +127,33 @@ void intel_uc_sanitize_options(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
                                              "no HuC firmware");
        }
  +     /* A negative value means "use platform/config default" */
+       if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level < 0)
+               i915_modparams.guc_log_level =
+                       __get_default_guc_log_level(dev_priv);
+
+       DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("guc_log_level=%d (enabled:%s verbosity:%d)\n",
+                        i915_modparams.guc_log_level,
+                        yesno(i915_modparams.guc_log_level > 0),
+                        i915_modparams.guc_log_level - 1);
+
I think this DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER should be moved after all sanitization.

Yes. I copied that from above enable_guc sanitization but forget that
in above code there is no override :)

+       if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level > 0 && !intel_uc_is_using_guc()) {
+               DRM_WARN("Incompatible option ignored: guc_log_level=%d, %s!\n",
+                        i915_modparams.guc_log_level,
+                        !HAS_GUC(dev_priv) ? "no GuC hardware" :
+                                             "GuC not enabled");
+               i915_modparams.guc_log_level = 0;
+       }
+
+       if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level > 1 + GUC_LOG_VERBOSITY_MAX) {
+               DRM_WARN("Incompatible option ignored: guc_log_level=%d, %s!\n",
"Incompatible option overridden"? as we are letting this through with max verbosity which I think is not ignoring :)

sure

+                        i915_modparams.guc_log_level, "verbosity too high");
+               i915_modparams.guc_log_level = 1 + GUC_LOG_VERBOSITY_MAX;
+       }
+
        /* Make sure that sanitization was done */
        GEM_BUG_ON(i915_modparams.enable_guc < 0);
+       GEM_BUG_ON(i915_modparams.guc_log_level < 0);
  }
    void intel_uc_init_early(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
@@ -152,7 +199,7 @@ void intel_uc_init_mmio(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
    static void guc_capture_load_err_log(struct intel_guc *guc)
  {
-       if (!guc->log.vma || i915_modparams.guc_log_level < 0)
+       if (!guc->log.vma || !i915_modparams.guc_log_level)
                return;
        if (!guc->load_err_log)
@@ -322,7 +369,7 @@ int intel_uc_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
        }
        if (USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(dev_priv)) {
-               if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level >= 0)
+               if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level)
                        gen9_enable_guc_interrupts(dev_priv);
                ret = intel_guc_submission_enable(guc);

Thanks
Sagar

Thanks,
Michal
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to