On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 10:37:54 +0200, Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:37:36PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 23:14:01 +0200, Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > It doesn't work since the gtt pte range sits in the middle of the mmio > > > bar. We didn't notice that since both my and Chris' gen2 machines > > > don't support PAT and hence all wc io mapping request will > > > automatically be demoted to uc. > > > > > > This regression has been introduce in > > > > > > commit edef7e685da05c13cce50c0126189c80fe2c8f71 > > > Author: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> > > > Date: Fri Sep 14 11:57:47 2012 +0100 > > > > > > agp/intel: Use a write-combining map for updating PTEs > > > > > > Reported-by: Egbert Eich <[email protected]> > > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55834 > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> > > > > Thanks for the explanation, > > Acked-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> > Patch merged to -fixes. > -Daniel > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch From: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: fixup the plane->pipe fixup code To: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>, Intel Graphics Development <[email protected]> Cc: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 23:14:00 +0200, Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> wrote: > We need to check whether the _other plane is on our pipe, not whether > our plane is on the other pipe. Otherwise if not both pipes/planes are > active, we won't properly clean up the mess and set up our desired > plane->pipe mapping. > > v2: Fixup the logic, I've totally fumbled it. Noticed by Chris Wilson. > > v3: I've checked Bspec, and the flexible plane->pipe mapping is a > gen2/3 feature, so test for that instead of PCH_SPLIT > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51265 > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49838 > Tested-by: Dave Airlie <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> Ok, looks good. I would move the gen check into intel_check_plane_mapping() itself with a short note that gen4+ has a fixed mapping. Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
