On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 03:27:36PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 17:15:26 +0300, [email protected] wrote: > > From: Dmitry Rogozhkin <[email protected]> > > > > Subsequent threads returning EBUSY from vm_insert_pfn() was not handled > > correctly. As a result concurrent access from new threads to > > mmapped data caused SIGBUS. > > > > Tested-by: Mika Kuoppala <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Rogozhkin <[email protected]> > > Fixes? Reported-by? > > I would order the case slightly different so that the comment block > comes after EIO. > > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
I've added the fixes note and applied both patches to -fixes. Thanks for the patch & review. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
