We will disarm the breadcrumb interrupt if we see a user interrupt
whilst no one is waiting. This may race with the call to
intel_engine_disarm_breadcrumbs() triggering an assert that we aren't
trying to do the same job twice. Prevent this by checking that the irq
is still armed after flushing the interrupt (for the irq spinlock).

Fixes: bcbd5c33a342 ("drm/i915/guc: Always enable the breadcrumbs irq")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
index 1bd0a461d665..4de054f8c1ba 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
@@ -219,7 +219,8 @@ void intel_engine_disarm_breadcrumbs(struct intel_engine_cs 
*engine)
 
        spin_lock(&b->irq_lock);
        first = fetch_and_zero(&b->irq_wait);
-       __intel_engine_disarm_breadcrumbs(engine);
+       if (b->irq_armed)
+               __intel_engine_disarm_breadcrumbs(engine);
        spin_unlock(&b->irq_lock);
 
        rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(wait, n, &b->waiters, node) {
-- 
2.15.0.rc2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to