On 22/09/2017 21:12, Srivatsa, Anusha wrote:
Sending to intel-gfx.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ursulin, Tvrtko
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 8:16 AM
To: Srivatsa, Anusha <[email protected]>; intel-
[email protected]
Cc: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>; Vetter, Daniel
<[email protected]>; Sundaresan, Sujaritha
<[email protected]>; Mateo Lozano, Oscar
<[email protected]>; Wajdeczko, Michal <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/guc: Add GuC Load time to dmesg log.
Hi,
For some reason this email hasn't appeared on the mailing list so apologies for
a
lame Outlook reply.
Thanks Tvrtko. I corrected the address.
I thought we agreed to use a better time source than jiffies (ktime_get()) and
also
that DRM_NOTE would get emitted only in the case of load time being over some
threshold. If it is in realm of normal it should be a normal DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER.
If it is over 20 ms (the threshold) wont DRM_ERROR be a better option? If it is
within that limit, then the info will be in DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER from which the QA
can pick it.
Error only if it fails to load I think. DRM_NOTE was for cases when it
succeeds but after taking unexpectedly long. Just so it is a level about
informational.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
