Op 18-09-17 om 17:03 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:12:50PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Commit b44d5c0c105a ("drm/i915: Always wait for flip_done, v2.") removed
>> the call to wait_for_vblanks and replaced it with flip_done.
>>
>> Unfortunately legacy_cursor_update was unset too late, and the
>> replacement call drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_flip_done() was
>> a noop. Make sure that its unset before setup_commit() is
>> called to fix this issue.
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Force vblank wait for watermarks not yet converted to atomic too. (Ville)
>> - Use for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state. (Ville)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]>
>> Fixes: b44d5c0c105a ("drm/i915: Always wait for flip_done, v2.")
>> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102675
>> Testcase: kms_cursor_crc
>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
>> Reported-by: Marta Löfstedt <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Marta Löfstedt <[email protected]>
>> Tested-by: Marta Löfstedt <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 45
>> +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> index 8599e425abb1..8d051256da1e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> @@ -12517,21 +12517,10 @@ static int intel_atomic_commit(struct drm_device
>> *dev,
>> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
>> int ret = 0;
>>
>> - ret = drm_atomic_helper_setup_commit(state, nonblock);
>> - if (ret)
>> - return ret;
>> -
>> drm_atomic_state_get(state);
>> i915_sw_fence_init(&intel_state->commit_ready,
>> intel_atomic_commit_ready);
>>
>> - ret = intel_atomic_prepare_commit(dev, state);
>> - if (ret) {
>> - DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("Preparing state failed with %i\n", ret);
>> - i915_sw_fence_commit(&intel_state->commit_ready);
>> - return ret;
>> - }
>> -
>> /*
>> * The intel_legacy_cursor_update() fast path takes care
>> * of avoiding the vblank waits for simple cursor
>> @@ -12540,19 +12529,37 @@ static int intel_atomic_commit(struct drm_device
>> *dev,
>> * updates happen during the correct frames. Gen9+ have
>> * double buffered watermarks and so shouldn't need this.
>> *
>> - * Do this after drm_atomic_helper_setup_commit() and
>> - * intel_atomic_prepare_commit() because we still want
>> - * to skip the flip and fb cleanup waits. Although that
>> - * does risk yanking the mapping from under the display
>> - * engine.
>> + * Unset state->legacy_cursor_update before the call to
>> + * drm_atomic_helper_setup_commit() because otherwise
>> + * drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_flip_done() is a noop and
>> + * we get FIFO underruns because we didn't wait
>> + * for vblank.
>> *
>> * FIXME doing watermarks and fb cleanup from a vblank worker
>> * (assuming we had any) would solve these problems.
>> */
>> - if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 9)
>> - state->legacy_cursor_update = false;
>> + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 9 && state->legacy_cursor_update) {
>> + struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
>> + struct intel_crtc *crtc;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(intel_state, crtc,
>> new_crtc_state, i)
>> + if (new_crtc_state->wm.need_postvbl_update ||
>> + new_crtc_state->update_wm_post)
>> + state->legacy_cursor_update = false;
> Hmm. I guess that's better. But I still don't see why you want to change
> this bit of code in this patch. AFAICS it's got nothing to do with the fix
> itself, and instead it's just trying to optimize some cursor updates
> that were kicked over to the slow path. Or am I missing something?
We accidentally removed the vblank wait for the slowpath, but I don't think we
should reintroduce the vblank except where we need it..
~Maarten
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
