On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 03:03:13PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> All the low level cdclk bits are present, so let's add the required
> hooks to reconfigure cdclk on the fly.
> 
> v2: Rebase due to cnl_sanitize_cdclk()
> v3: Rebased by Rodrigo on top of Ville's cdclk rework.
> v4: Rebase moving cnl_calc_cdclk up to follow same order
>     as previous platforms.
> v2: Squash drm/i915/cnl: Adjust min pixel rate. to address
>     the current limitation where CDCLK cannot be set to 168MHz
>     if audio is used with 96MHz. (Imre)
> 
> Cc: Imre Deak <[email protected]>
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]>
> 
> Cannonlake also needs to adjust the minimal pixel rate
> as gen9 platforms. Specially for the Azalia audio case.
> 
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <[email protected]>
> Cc: Sanyog Kale <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 56 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> index 35a1432..1d7cfc5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -1400,6 +1400,16 @@ void bxt_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv)
>       bxt_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state);
>  }
>  
> +static int cnl_calc_cdclk(int max_pixclk)
> +{
> +     if (max_pixclk > 336000)
> +             return 528000;
> +     else if (max_pixclk > 168000)
> +             return 336000;
> +     else
> +             return 168000;
> +}
> +
>  static void cnl_cdclk_pll_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>                                struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
>  {
> @@ -1641,7 +1651,7 @@ void cnl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  
>       cdclk_state = dev_priv->cdclk.hw;
>  
> -     cdclk_state.cdclk = 168000;
> +     cdclk_state.cdclk = cnl_calc_cdclk(0);
>       cdclk_state.vco = cnl_cdclk_pll_vco(dev_priv, cdclk_state.cdclk);
>  
>       cnl_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state);
> @@ -1768,7 +1778,7 @@ static int intel_max_pixel_rate(struct drm_atomic_state 
> *state)
>  
>               pixel_rate = crtc_state->pixel_rate;
>  
> -             if (IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv) || IS_GEN9(dev_priv))
> +             if (IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv) || INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9)
>                       pixel_rate =
>                               bdw_adjust_min_pipe_pixel_rate(crtc_state,
>                                                              pixel_rate);

I think you might also have to adjust some of the clock limits
within bdw_adjust_min_pipe_pixel_rate().

> @@ -1929,6 +1939,40 @@ static int bxt_modeset_calc_cdclk(struct 
> drm_atomic_state *state)
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int cnl_modeset_calc_cdclk(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> +{
> +     struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->dev);
> +     struct intel_atomic_state *intel_state =
> +             to_intel_atomic_state(state);
> +     int max_pixclk = intel_max_pixel_rate(state);
> +     int cdclk, vco;
> +
> +     cdclk = cnl_calc_cdclk(max_pixclk);
> +     vco = cnl_cdclk_pll_vco(dev_priv, cdclk);
> +
> +     if (cdclk > dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq) {
> +             DRM_DEBUG_KMS("requested cdclk (%d kHz) exceeds max (%d kHz)\n",
> +                           cdclk, dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq);
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +     }
> +
> +     intel_state->cdclk.logical.vco = vco;
> +     intel_state->cdclk.logical.cdclk = cdclk;
> +
> +     if (!intel_state->active_crtcs) {
> +             cdclk = cnl_calc_cdclk(0);
> +             vco = cnl_cdclk_pll_vco(dev_priv, cdclk);
> +
> +             intel_state->cdclk.actual.vco = vco;
> +             intel_state->cdclk.actual.cdclk = cdclk;
> +     } else {
> +             intel_state->cdclk.actual =
> +                     intel_state->cdclk.logical;
> +     }
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int intel_compute_max_dotclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
>       int max_cdclk_freq = dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq;
> @@ -1960,7 +2004,9 @@ static int intel_compute_max_dotclk(struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>   */
>  void intel_update_max_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
> -     if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv)) {
> +     if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv)) {
> +             dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq = 528000;
> +     } else if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv)) {
>               u32 limit = I915_READ(SKL_DFSM) & SKL_DFSM_CDCLK_LIMIT_MASK;
>               int max_cdclk, vco;
>  
> @@ -2157,6 +2203,10 @@ void intel_init_cdclk_hooks(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv)
>               dev_priv->display.set_cdclk = skl_set_cdclk;
>               dev_priv->display.modeset_calc_cdclk =
>                       skl_modeset_calc_cdclk;
> +     } else if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv)) {
> +             dev_priv->display.set_cdclk = cnl_set_cdclk;
> +             dev_priv->display.modeset_calc_cdclk =
> +                     cnl_modeset_calc_cdclk;
>       }
>  
>       if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv))
> -- 
> 1.9.1

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to