Chris Wilson <[email protected]> writes: > Settting up the irq to signal the request completion takes a finite ^-t
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <[email protected]> > amount of time, during which it is possible that the request already > completed. Check afterwards, just in case, so that we can respond > immediately. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c > index 0d1e0d8873ef..46d869e26b4d 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c > @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static bool i915_fence_enable_signaling(struct dma_fence > *fence) > return false; > > intel_engine_enable_signaling(to_request(fence), true); > - return true; > + return !i915_fence_signaled(fence); > } > > static signed long i915_fence_wait(struct dma_fence *fence, > -- > 2.11.0 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
