On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 11:04:18AM +0800, Chuanxiao Dong wrote:
> GVT-g relies on the enable_execlists parameter in i915. If this option
> is not enabled for GVT-g, should return -EIO to make i915 driver loading
> failed.
>
> Suggested-by: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Chuanxiao Dong <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_gvt.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_gvt.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_gvt.c
> index dde9c78..c90d476 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_gvt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_gvt.c
> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ int intel_gvt_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>
> if (!i915.enable_execlists) {
> DRM_INFO("GPU guest virtualisation [GVT-g] disabled due to
> disabled execlist submission [i915.enable_execlists module parameter]\n");
> - goto bail;
> + return -EIO;
Hmm, interesting debate as to whether or not you still want to set
i915.enable_gvt=0 to indicate gvt being lost. Since this will cause the
driver to fail to load, it should be now DRM_ERROR("and the error
message changed to reflect the fatal failure!") and having modprobe
report -EIO with i915.enable_gvt still to 1 seems like the best approach.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
