On 15/05/2017 11:45, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 11:18:11AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 12/05/2017 14:53, Chris Wilson wrote:
Storing both the mask and the id is redundant as we can trivially
compute one from the other. As the mask is more frequently used, remove
the id.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <[email protected]>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 12 ++++++------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h | 6 ++----
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index bd9abef40c66..a2c9c3e792e1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -1468,7 +1468,7 @@ static int i915_forcewake_domains(struct seq_file *m,
void *data)
for_each_fw_domain(fw_domain, i915, tmp)
seq_printf(m, "%s.wake_count = %u\n",
- intel_uncore_forcewake_domain_to_str(fw_domain->id),
+ intel_uncore_forcewake_domain_to_str(fw_domain),
READ_ONCE(fw_domain->wake_count));
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
index 08d7d08438c0..7eaa592aed26 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
@@ -40,8 +40,10 @@ static const char * const forcewake_domain_names[] = {
};
const char *
-intel_uncore_forcewake_domain_to_str(const enum forcewake_domain_id id)
+intel_uncore_forcewake_domain_to_str(const struct
intel_uncore_forcewake_domain *d)
{
+ unsigned int id = ilog2(d->mask);
+
BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(forcewake_domain_names) != FW_DOMAIN_ID_COUNT);
if (id >= 0 && id < FW_DOMAIN_ID_COUNT)
@@ -77,7 +79,7 @@ fw_domain_wait_ack_clear(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
FORCEWAKE_KERNEL) == 0,
FORCEWAKE_ACK_TIMEOUT_MS))
DRM_ERROR("%s: timed out waiting for forcewake ack to clear.\n",
- intel_uncore_forcewake_domain_to_str(d->id));
+ intel_uncore_forcewake_domain_to_str(d));
}
static inline void
@@ -95,7 +97,7 @@ fw_domain_wait_ack(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
FORCEWAKE_KERNEL),
FORCEWAKE_ACK_TIMEOUT_MS))
DRM_ERROR("%s: timed out waiting for forcewake ack request.\n",
- intel_uncore_forcewake_domain_to_str(d->id));
+ intel_uncore_forcewake_domain_to_str(d));
}
static inline void
@@ -209,7 +211,7 @@ intel_uncore_fw_release_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
struct intel_uncore_forcewake_domain *domain =
container_of(timer, struct intel_uncore_forcewake_domain, timer);
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv =
- container_of(domain, struct drm_i915_private,
uncore.fw_domain[domain->id]);
+ container_of(domain, struct drm_i915_private,
uncore.fw_domain[ilog2(domain->mask)]);
Not sure I see the benefit of removing one field and then needing
this ilog2 in the timer callback.
Timer was infrequent enough compared to the other paths that the extra
instruction seemed a matter of little concern, and out of the way.
On one hand that's true, one the other it just looks inelegant.
Would storing a backpointer to intel_uncore from each domain be
acceptable or it would defeat the purpose?
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
