On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:22:32AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2017, Manasi Navare <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Why not squash this with patch 08/14? and call it cleanup for obtaining the
> > rate index using intel_dp_rate_index()
> > Just a thought..
> 
> Again, usually too big patches are the problem, not the other way
> around.
> 
> BR,
> Jani.
>

OK, your call. Functionality wise looks good and I have tested this.


> >
> > Regards
> > Manasi
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:59:12PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> Localize link_rate_index to the if block, and rename to just index to
> >> reduce indent.
> >> 
> >> Cc: Manasi Navare <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
    Reviewed-by: <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 13 +++++++------
> >>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c 
> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> >> index 95f2278700e3..6f743490855b 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> >> @@ -1636,7 +1636,6 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder 
> >> *encoder,
> >>    /* Conveniently, the link BW constants become indices with a shift...*/
> >>    int min_clock = 0;
> >>    int max_clock;
> >> -  int link_rate_index;
> >>    int bpp, mode_rate;
> >>    int link_avail, link_clock;
> >>    int common_len;
> >> @@ -1680,11 +1679,13 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder 
> >> *encoder,
> >>  
> >>    /* Use values requested by Compliance Test Request */
> >>    if (intel_dp->compliance.test_type == DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING) {
> >> -          link_rate_index = intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->common_rates,
> >> -                                                
> >> intel_dp->num_common_rates,
> >> -                                                
> >> intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate);
> >> -          if (link_rate_index >= 0)
> >> -                  min_clock = max_clock = link_rate_index;
> >> +          int index;
> >> +
> >> +          index = intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->common_rates,
> >> +                                      intel_dp->num_common_rates,
> >> +                                      
> >> intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate);
> >> +          if (index >= 0)
> >> +                  min_clock = max_clock = index;
> >>            min_lane_count = max_lane_count = 
> >> intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count;
> >>    }
> >>    DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DP link computation with max lane count %i "
> >> -- 
> >> 2.1.4
> >> 
> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to