Chris Wilson <[email protected]> writes:

> Provide some serialisation between user operations by waiting for the
> reset initiated by setting i915_wedged to complete.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 5fdf8c137235..ada823815b8a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -4129,6 +4129,10 @@ i915_wedged_set(void *data, u64 val)
>       i915_handle_error(dev_priv, val,
>                         "Manually setting wedged to %llu", val);
>  
> +     wait_on_bit(&dev_priv->gpu_error.flags,
> +                 I915_RESET_HANDOFF,
> +                 TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> +

But what happens here if we have already prevented the reset and
the handoff never clears? Seems like it is a stuck task as the
handoff is not cleared on error path in i915_reset.

-Mika


>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.11.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to