On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 02:00:50PM +0000, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> Additionally use runtime check to catch invalid engine indices.

Oh no you don't!
 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> index a238304..8df53ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> @@ -89,6 +89,8 @@ intel_engine_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>       const struct engine_info *info = &intel_engines[id];
>       struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
>  
> +     BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(intel_engines) != I915_NUM_ENGINES);
> +     GEM_BUG_ON(id < 0 || id >= I915_NUM_ENGINES);

Are you sure sparse/smatch won't complain?
/me too lazy to check the C standard for signedness of an enum without a
negative value.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to