On ti, 2017-01-31 at 13:15 +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
>
> Instead of sprinkling around usage and initialization of
> i915_execbuffer_params we can consolidate it just before
> execbuf_submit for maintability and readability.
>
> That way we can also drop the memset since it becomes
> easy to spot we initialize all the fields.
>
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 1085466 26398 2628 1114492 11017c i915.ko.0
> 1085402 26398 2628 1114428 11013c i915.ko.1
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
<SNIP>
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -50,14 +50,14 @@
> #define BATCH_OFFSET_BIAS (256*1024)
>
> struct i915_execbuffer_params {
> - struct drm_device *dev;
> - struct drm_file *file;
> - struct i915_vma *batch;
> - u32 dispatch_flags;
> - u32 args_batch_start_offset;
> - struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> - struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
> - struct drm_i915_gem_request *request;
> + struct drm_device *dev;
> + struct drm_file *file;
> + struct i915_vma *batch;
> + u32 dispatch_flags;
> + u32 batch_start;
> + struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> + struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
> + struct drm_i915_gem_request *request;
> };
You could just drop the pretty spaces totally. Otherwise, when
something gets changed, the whole struct has to be re-indented.
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
