... too much risk for flaky edid transfers.
Cc: Daniel Kurtz <[email protected]>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49518
Reported-and-Tested-by: Julian Simioni <[email protected]>
Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c
index e04255e..0588d8e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c
@@ -418,10 +418,11 @@ clear_err:
* If no ACK is received during the address phase of a transaction,
* the adapter must report -ENXIO.
* It is not clear what to return if no ACK is received at other times.
- * So, we always return -ENXIO in all NAK cases, to ensure we send
- * it at least during the one case that is specified.
+ *
+ * Unfortunately we can't afford false positives in returning -ENXIO,
+ * hence never return -ENXIO.
*/
- ret = -ENXIO;
+ ret = i;
goto out;
timeout:
--
1.7.10
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
