On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 04:41:51PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 15-12-16 om 16:36 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 04:28:52PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> Op 15-12-16 om 16:23 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> >>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 04:17:45PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >>>> Op 12-12-16 om 21:35 schreef [email protected]:
> >>>>> From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Add a test to try out all the different plane enable/disable
> >>>>> order permutations.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> >>>> Didn't look through the test, but sounds like
> >>>>
> >>>> kms_atomic_transitions.plane-*-transition-* ?
> >>>>
> >>>> Although that one tests a few more edge cases like modeset disable and 
> >>>> nonblocking updates..
> >>> I don't immediately see where it would try all the permutations, nor can
> >>> I see any crc_nonblock() stuff so doesn't seem like it could even spot
> >>> transient errors.
> >>>
> >> I haven't done any crc test there yet, but the double loop in 
> >> run_transition_test handles all combinations of planes.
> > permutations > combinations
> >
> It permutates too, I used it for some basic wm testing before. :)

Does it? I'm too lazy to reverse engineed it, so I just tried to run it
but it didn't want to run, so meh.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to