According to the previous patch, it's possible atm that we call intel_do_sagv_disable() only once during the 1ms period and time out if that call fails. As opposed to this the spec says that we need to keep retrying this request for a 1ms duration, so let's do this similarly to the CDCLK change notification request.
v4-5: - Rebased on the reply_mask, reply change. v6: - Remove w/s change. (Lyude) - Rebased on the timeout_base argument change. Cc: Lyude <[email protected]> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Cc: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Lyude <[email protected]> (v4) --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 34 +++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c index 6c2fa34..e7c4891 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c @@ -2954,24 +2954,10 @@ intel_enable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) return 0; } -static int -intel_do_sagv_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) -{ - int ret; - uint32_t temp = GEN9_SAGV_DISABLE; - - ret = sandybridge_pcode_read(dev_priv, GEN9_PCODE_SAGV_CONTROL, - &temp); - if (ret) - return ret; - else - return temp & GEN9_SAGV_IS_DISABLED; -} - int intel_disable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) { - int ret, result; + int ret; if (!intel_has_sagv(dev_priv)) return 0; @@ -2983,25 +2969,23 @@ intel_disable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) mutex_lock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock); /* bspec says to keep retrying for at least 1 ms */ - ret = wait_for(result = intel_do_sagv_disable(dev_priv), 1); + ret = skl_pcode_request(dev_priv, GEN9_PCODE_SAGV_CONTROL, + GEN9_SAGV_DISABLE, + GEN9_SAGV_IS_DISABLED, GEN9_SAGV_IS_DISABLED, + 1); mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock); - if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT) { - DRM_ERROR("Request to disable SAGV timed out\n"); - return -ETIMEDOUT; - } - /* * Some skl systems, pre-release machines in particular, * don't actually have an SAGV. */ - if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && result == -ENXIO) { + if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && ret == -ENXIO) { DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("No SAGV found on system, ignoring\n"); dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED; return 0; - } else if (result < 0) { - DRM_ERROR("Failed to disable the SAGV\n"); - return result; + } else if (ret < 0) { + DRM_ERROR("Failed to disable the SAGV (%d)\n", ret); + return ret; } dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_DISABLED; -- 2.5.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
