On 28/11/2016 11:35, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:15:27AM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:

On 25/11/2016 09:30, Chris Wilson wrote:
i915_guc_info() (part of debugfs output) tries to avoid holding
struct_mutex for a long period by copying onto the stack. This causes a
warning that the stack frame is massive, so stop doing that. We can even
forgo holding the struct_mutex here as that doesn't serialise the values
being read (and the lists used exist for the device lifetime).

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 39 +++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index 8eb8c29b7492..7676e88ae5f2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -2434,47 +2434,36 @@ static void i915_guc_client_info(struct seq_file *m,
static int i915_guc_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
{
        struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = node_to_i915(m->private);
-       struct drm_device *dev = &dev_priv->drm;
-       struct intel_guc guc;
-       struct i915_guc_client client = {};
+       const struct intel_guc *guc = &dev_priv->guc;
        struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
        enum intel_engine_id id;
-       u64 total = 0;
+       u64 total;

        if (!HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev_priv))
                return 0;

-       if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->struct_mutex))
-               return 0;
-
-       /* Take a local copy of the GuC data, so we can dump it at leisure */
-       guc = dev_priv->guc;
-       if (guc.execbuf_client)
-               client = *guc.execbuf_client;

So this used to print out all zeros when GuC submission is disabled.
Should we instead just skip all the counter dumping if
execbuf_client == NULL and just print "disabled" or something?

That would be the sensible escape instead of HAS_GUC_SCHED.

if (!dev_priv->guc.execbuf_client) {
        seq_puts(m, "GuC scheduling %s\n",
                 HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev_priv) ?  "disabled" : "not supported");
        return 0;
}

That looks good to me. (Just printf, not puts.)

Regards,

Tvrtko

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to