On Sun, 6 Nov 2011 01:41:35 +0100, Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> wrote: > Use a combination of atomic_t and a spinlocked slow-path to make most > writes fast.
What happened to the rule that this was protected by struct_mutex? Did you find a violation? Or is this step 1 in the hundred step plan to clarify and fix the locking around register access? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
