On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:12:11 +0100, Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> wrote: > The code already got unwindy and we want to dump more per-ring > registers.
So this patch is to cook the spaghetti then? Not sure if unwindy conjures the right imagery, I still think you mean unwieldly. ;) > Only functional change is that we now also capture the video > ring registers on ilk. > > v2: fixup a refactor fumble spotted by Chris Wilson. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
