On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:37:14 +0200, Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 09:13:39PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 20:49:16 +0200, Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > Fixes tests/gem_tiled_pread on my snb. I know, mesa doesn't use this > > > on gen6+, but I also hate failing testcases. > > > > Hmm, I thought gen6 also has DRAM configuration registers that we were > > meant to set and to follow. Not that I could actually find the > > cross-references! I've been surprised that it works and scared > > to poke too hard just in case it was broken underneath. ;-) > > Well, I've checked with my ilk and snb, and now it works for both. ymmv. > The other options is to return SWIZZLE_UNKOWN back to userspace and > disable the tests on gen5+. I don't care too much either way, but I think > making it work is less risky. And now that qa actually runs our tests, we > might even catch this earlier.
I suspect we are missing some code to handle atypical configurations. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
