On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 14:00:22 +0200, Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> wrote: > The rps disabling code wasn't properly cancelling outstanding work > items. Also add a comment that explains why we're not racing with > the work item that could unmask interrupts - that piece of code > confused me quite a bit. > > v2: Ben Widawsky pointed out that the first patch would deadlock > (and a few lesser problems). All corrected. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <[email protected]>
And since presumably the chip is in a completely different thermal envelope and thawed, waking up the task function is pointless after resume. ;-) With the original deadlocks gone, Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
