On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:04:49 -0800, Eric Anholt <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:58:03 +0000, Chris Wilson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Dave, a few more days have passed and we have a fresh batch of > > regression fixes. > > > > The patch that is most notable is one for its absence: > > > > commit 25ed6eb15ebc4472fb0e473666c0ef3bba87097f > > Author: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> > > Date: Wed Dec 22 11:37:09 2010 +0000 > > > > agp/intel: Experiment with a 855GM GWB bit > > > > is still sitting on drm-intel-staging just begging for someone with an > > 865g to give it the once over. > > Tested-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
Thanks a lot Eric! Knowing that it does not cause 865g to spontaneously burst into flames makes me feel a lot more comfortable with it. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
